Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Ballot, nweek 10 (and more recognitions)

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Now, how do I tie thith thing...?

On 3/23/02 at 4:38 PM Tyler Crosby wrote:

>> >Proposal 482/0: Second Law of Thermodynomics v2.0 (The Voice)
>>No.  I prefer Charm over the number of proposals submitted, since Charm
>>reflects the proposals enacted.  Now, if you were to change it to the
>>number of proposals enacted...
>>						Glotmorf
>
>Glotmorf, you ninny.  If you had actually read the proposal, you would see
>that it says, "number of proposals e had on the ballot for that nweek
>which
>passed."  As far as I know, passed and enacted mean more or less the same
>thing in this situation.  You don't have a complaint.  Voting against
>something is one thing, voting against something and giving an incorrect
>reasoning is another.
>
>-0- Thus Spake The Voice -0-

I object to the term "ninny".  It'th not in current vogue, and carrieth a thertain thithified connotation to it. (Ith a thithy thomeone who can't coherently thay "thithified"?)  I believe "moron" ith currently in fathion.

Athide from that, one might look at your propothal and conthider "that nweek which passed" to mean the nweek that ith now over.  Ethpecially when one ith looking at it at 3:00 am.

I think I thtill prefer Charm, though.  There are other thingth that can increath entropy in the thythtem, and they can be tied to Charm too.  But thinth I apparently mithread the propothal, I'll change my vote on it to Abthtain, thinth the resulth aren't pothted yet.

						Glotmorf

P Eth: Doeth anyone know if I can grant negative thtyle pointh?