RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ: Ruling

["Gavin Doig" <gmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> So...basically my fundamental contention that
> r129/2 is doing something bad is met by the
> fundamental contention that it's actually not
> doing anything at all...:)
>
In the conditions where it would be bad for it to do something? Yes.

It only does anything where the admin says something wrong, and we don't object. Since that will (usually) be when we don't notice, we'll (usually) not notice that it's doing anything. If you still cling to the idea that the admin's statements are the gamestate, then I suppose you could say it does nothing...

uin.
-- 

_______________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup