RE: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: nweek 5 results!

[Dan <wald7330@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > > Right, found it.  It was ruled illegal by CFJ 305, so the Admin
> was not at the time obligated to do anything in response to it, and
> the game state wasn't affected then. > > So if your action was an
> illegal action then, but by r129 is a legal action now, then r129 is
> changing the nature of the action.  Since the action was in the past,
> r129 making it legal would change the past, which is illegal by r17,
> which takes precedence over r129.
> 
> And therefore, Rule 129 is useless, and Uncle Psychosis's campaign to
> correct it is quite justified.  So how much longer does he have to keep
> shoving it in our faces before we vote in one of his proposals to fix it,
> eh?

I agree.  Rule 129 needs to be fixed.  I just don't like the ways in which
Uncle Psychosis has tried to fix it. 

Dan