Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: proposals

[Antonio <zagarna@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:58:42 -0500, Rob Speer <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 10:08:32PM +0100, Antonio wrote:
>> replace any instance of the words "revisiable" or "revisable" with "revisable
>> objects"
>
>So we get an infinitely long ruleset which says "revisable objects
>objects objects objects objects objects objects objects objects objects
>objects objects objects objects objects objects objects objects objects
>objects objects objects objects objects ..." ?

I propose a action (one-time), not a rule (permanent in time).
If what you claim was true, then the same kind of recursion would apply when
someone proposes "replace the second paragraph/sentence/word of rule x/y with
foo". 
The paragraph/sentence/word should be replaced infinite times, requiring an
infinite amount of the administrator's time.
I think not.
--
Rivoluzione:
  \o_  (o      __)   ( /    |__     o_  _o/
   |   /\  __\o  \o   |   o/  o/__  (\   |
  / \ |\  /) |   ( \ /o) / |  (  (\  /| / \

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com