Rob Speer on 5 Dec 2001 22:09:24 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: More Typo Corrections


On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 04:55:25PM -0500, Rob Speer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 05:21:33PM +0000, is9219@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > Proposal: More Typo Corrections
> > 
> > 1. In rule 19/0, change the word ?reviseable? to ?revisable?.
> > 2.  A reviseable Object is not an Object, and this sentence will delete 
> > itself once the ruleset no longer refers to reviseable Objects. 
> > 3. In rule 4/0, change the word ?differientiate? to the 
> > word ?differentiate?.
> > 4. In rule 5/0, change the word ?intrerpolated? to the 
> > word ?interpolated?.
> > 5. In rule 5/0, change the word ?premissible? to the word ?permissible?.
> > 6. This proposal will demonstrate an example of the theorem which 
> > hypothesizes that any post commenting on typos or grammatical errors 
> > will itself have at least one typo and/or grammatical errorr.
> 
> Well, you posted that to spoon-discuss, so it doesn't count as a
> proposal. I was about to fix my "Reviising the typos" proposal, and I'll
> include "reviseable" in that, but go ahead and include the other stuff
> in your own proposal.

Actually, I now see that the self-referential part of my proposal I
needed to fix was in the "Bucks" proposal, so I'm not bothering with
changing the other proposal. So go ahead and propose all of those items.

-- 
Rob Speer