Rob Speer on 5 Dec 2001 22:09:24 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: More Typo Corrections |
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 04:55:25PM -0500, Rob Speer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 05:21:33PM +0000, is9219@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > Proposal: More Typo Corrections > > > > 1. In rule 19/0, change the word ?reviseable? to ?revisable?. > > 2. A reviseable Object is not an Object, and this sentence will delete > > itself once the ruleset no longer refers to reviseable Objects. > > 3. In rule 4/0, change the word ?differientiate? to the > > word ?differentiate?. > > 4. In rule 5/0, change the word ?intrerpolated? to the > > word ?interpolated?. > > 5. In rule 5/0, change the word ?premissible? to the word ?permissible?. > > 6. This proposal will demonstrate an example of the theorem which > > hypothesizes that any post commenting on typos or grammatical errors > > will itself have at least one typo and/or grammatical errorr. > > Well, you posted that to spoon-discuss, so it doesn't count as a > proposal. I was about to fix my "Reviising the typos" proposal, and I'll > include "reviseable" in that, but go ahead and include the other stuff > in your own proposal. Actually, I now see that the self-referential part of my proposal I needed to fix was in the "Bucks" proposal, so I'm not bothering with changing the other proposal. So go ahead and propose all of those items. -- Rob Speer