Rob Speer on 5 Dec 2001 21:57:40 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: More Typo Corrections |
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 05:21:33PM +0000, is9219@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Proposal: More Typo Corrections > > 1. In rule 19/0, change the word ?reviseable? to ?revisable?. > 2. A reviseable Object is not an Object, and this sentence will delete > itself once the ruleset no longer refers to reviseable Objects. > 3. In rule 4/0, change the word ?differientiate? to the > word ?differentiate?. > 4. In rule 5/0, change the word ?intrerpolated? to the > word ?interpolated?. > 5. In rule 5/0, change the word ?premissible? to the word ?permissible?. > 6. This proposal will demonstrate an example of the theorem which > hypothesizes that any post commenting on typos or grammatical errors > will itself have at least one typo and/or grammatical errorr. Well, you posted that to spoon-discuss, so it doesn't count as a proposal. I was about to fix my "Reviising the typos" proposal, and I'll include "reviseable" in that, but go ahead and include the other stuff in your own proposal. Also, part 2 of your proposal is not worded as part of a proposal; it simply mentions a state of being. You could prefix "Create a rule with the following text:" to it to make it work. -- Rob Speer