Re: spoon-discuss: winning

Antonio on 23 Jun 2001 00:08:45 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: winning

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: winning
From: Antonio <zagarna@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 02:09:17 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106220140380.11782-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106220140380.11782-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:44:04 -0500 (CDT), you wrote:

>I would like to see winning take on the role of an award for 'most
>manipulative' - getting back to the roots of suber's game in which one
>could win if the game was brought to a standstill because of paradox or
>other such zaniness.
>
>any more votes for manipulation vs simple activity?


count me in :)
-- 
A.D.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

References:
- spoon-discuss: winning
  - From: Benjamin Bradley

Prev by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: winning
Next by Date: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: some rfjs recognized
Previous by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: winning
Next by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: winning
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread