Re: spoon-discuss: Umm...

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth "Gavin M. Doig":
> > > Rule 234/0 : Requests for Judgment:
> > > A Request for Judgment is a Personal Order.
> > >
> > > Rule 114/0 : Orders:
> > > An Order must be either Legislative, Motive, Administrative, Judicial,
> or
> > > Private.
> >
> > For CFJs to be issued, this has to be sent to the business list.
> > Poulenc
> >
> That wasn't an attempt to call for judgement. I wasn't even a player...
> 
> Anyway, it seems that rule 234/1 has already fixed the problem. I'm not
> quite sure when... oh, 11 November. I'm not quite sure why I was looking at
> /0, not /1.
> 
> Actually, further checking reveals all RFJs are from before November 11.

Except the newest two, which haven't quite made it to the page yet... I'll be getting to that sometime post-2pm tomorrow.

-- 
J.