Harrison, Andrew on 15 Jan 2001 09:07:04 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Proposal - Motion of non confidance


> 
> [[Okay, one last time]]
> 
> I rescind my previous attempt to create a proposal.
> 
> The following is a new proposal entitled "Motions of no confidance"
> 
> _____
> 
> Amend rule 315 by changing its title to "Motions of no 
> confidance" and by
> replacing its text with the following two paragraphs:
> 
> A Motion of non confidence is a secondary approvable motion 
> used to evict
> an elected officer who loses the support of the voters.  The 
> motion must
> specify the elected office to be targeted.  A Motion of non 
> confidence may
> not be subject to unanimous consent and requires a passage ratio of
> two-thirds.
> 
> Upon the adotion of the motion of non confidence the term of 
> the targeted
> office is set to expire at the end of the current nweek.
> 

Why not kick them out of office immediately and have the Administrator take
over till the election?

--
The Kid