spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal Motion of non confidence (fwd)

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth Dan Waldron:
> [[Drat.  That's what I get for not reading the ruleset first.  Here it
> goes again.  This brings the existing rule into line with the electoral
> system.]]
> 
> I rescind my attempt to create a new proposal entitled "Motions of non
> confidence."
> 
> The following is a new proposal entitled "Officers and Gentlemen Fix"
> 
> _____
> Amend rule 315 by changing it to read as follows:
> 
> A Motion of non confidence is a secondary approvable motion used to evict
> an elected officer who loses the support of the voters.  The motion must
> specify the elected office to be targeted.  A Motion of non confidence may
> not be subject to unanimous consent and requires a passage ratio of
> two-thirds.
> 
> Upon the adotion of the motion of non confidence the term of the targeted
> office is set to expire at the end of the current nweek.
> _____
> 
> Poulenc

Why not change the title of the Rule as well? That would make it easier to 
find.

-- 
J.