Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Proposal - Motion of non confidance

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth "Harrison, Andrew":
> > 
> > [[Okay, one last time]]
> > 
> > I rescind my previous attempt to create a proposal.
> > 
> > The following is a new proposal entitled "Motions of no confidance"
> > 
> > _____
> > 
> > Amend rule 315 by changing its title to "Motions of no 
> > confidance" and by
> > replacing its text with the following two paragraphs:
> > 
> > A Motion of non confidence is a secondary approvable motion 
> > used to evict
> > an elected officer who loses the support of the voters.  The 
> > motion must
> > specify the elected office to be targeted.  A Motion of non 
> > confidence may
> > not be subject to unanimous consent and requires a passage ratio of
> > two-thirds.
> > 
> > Upon the adotion of the motion of non confidence the term of 
> > the targeted
> > office is set to expire at the end of the current nweek.
> > 
> 
> Why not kick them out of office immediately and have the Administrator take
> over till the election?
> 
> --
> The Kid

If we remove an Officer this way, it's probably because they're doing bad 
things or not doing their job, so I'd have to agree with The Kid.

-- 
J.