spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ 15 (formerly Judgment on RFJ13)

[Adam Tomjack <adamtj@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

(Sun, 08 Oct 2000) Thus Spake Joel Uckelman:

> Yeah, I knew this was going to happen. This is one of the *BAD* things
> about our judicial system. Now I'm not sure if Benjamin is a Player--is
> "should not be listed on the Roster" equivalent to "is not a Player"? I
> don't know. If they are, I need only execute a removal of Benjamin from the
> Roster within a reasonable time. 

If you'll note in my original judgement, I gave no Judicial Order.  I 
explicitly gave an Order in the second post which ordered the Administrator 
not to remove Benjamin from the Roster.  I see no reason why a Judgement and 
the corresponding Judicial Order need to be in the same physical (virtual??) 
message, nor why the Judicial Order needs to logically follow from the 
Judgement.  ;)

God 


-- 
Adam Tomjack
adamtj@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.adamtj.com