Craig Daniel on Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:18:55 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Emergency Resolution |
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 1. Game time is stopped. DONE > > 2. A Forum is established. (I think we can all agree to use the spoon-business > mailing list) > > 3. An Emergency Co-Ordinator is established. (Gotta do this) > > > I volunteer to be the Emergency Co-Ordinator. Are there any objections? Somehow I haven't gotten the e-mail you quoted in my inbox yet. I'd be interested in seeing the argument in favor of that ruleset, but I think the argument that that's its rule 0 is probably going to prove (once I hear it) to sufficiently robust for us to emerge thereunder. Therefore, I recognize an Emergency. We can't agree to make you emergency coordinator until we are actually recognizing an emergency in sufficient numbers, but I think the only reasonable way to do it will be by acclimation; I have no intention of objecting to, well, anybody. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business