Re: [s-b] [s-d] Emergency Resolution

[Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx>]

Okay, then, I recognize an Emergency. I believe that makes 3 recognizances now; 
for a majority, we need 6.



----- Original Message ----
> From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: spoon-business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sun, December 26, 2010 3:12:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Emergency Resolution
> 
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 1.  Game time is stopped. DONE
> >
> > 2. A Forum is established. (I think  we can all agree to use the 
>spoon-business
> > mailing list)
> >
> >  3. An Emergency Co-Ordinator is established. (Gotta do  this)
> >
> >
> > I volunteer to be the Emergency Co-Ordinator. Are  there any objections?
> 
> Somehow I haven't gotten the e-mail you quoted in  my inbox yet. I'd be
> interested in seeing the argument in favor of that  ruleset, but I
> think the argument that that's its rule 0 is probably going to  prove
> (once I hear it) to sufficiently robust for us to emerge  thereunder.
> Therefore, I recognize an Emergency.
> 
> We can't agree to  make you emergency coordinator until we are actually
> recognizing an emergency  in sufficient numbers, but I think the only
> reasonable way to do it will be  by acclimation; I have no intention of
> objecting to, well,  anybody.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business  mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 


      
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business