Craig Daniel on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:03:30 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 123 |
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > FALSE. The player generally known as teucer does not have the name "Murphy" as > this name is already in use as a unique identifier for another player. If teucer > were to have the name "Murphy", that would violate the first paragraph of Rule > 2/0, "All game entities must have uniquely identifying names", which I interpret > to mean that all identifying names held by a player [[basically all names that > aren't titles]]. I appeal the above judgement. Arguments: While the judge is correct that "All game entities must have uniquely-identifying names", and this unambiguously means all identifying names held by players must be unique, the fact that something MUST happen does *not* mean that it does - merely that players who MUST do something are in violation of the rule in question. (See Rule 14.) Ergo, the MUST clause in Rule 2 does not block me from becoming a player with the relevant name; it merely means that the other Murphy is breaking Rule 2. (I do have to specify a unique name when joining, but as I in fact specified four of them I should be good.) - teucer _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business