Re: [s-b] CFI 116

Craig Daniel on Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:01:54 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] CFI 116

To: spoon-business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] CFI 116
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:01:49 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=baIgrjKAuMeakWPR+riQGOzBnzMx+TF82QO/xpbRp5E=; b=O9CdbW5feD9rYEco7p/g0nckAdroOw1bP7mKBNKfl7vT31O+1tGgTA6kDyDoMpoyNQ ZcRnNhXhfcPgLLbU13lEv+xdfkq4juIJvecuHamTz//q2T6e76mcMGaZmx7Zi+Y1xxWM upjfHBPxbSD46U3/GFalW2AOJH5bNhlKrr12k=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=pv6QBgk4lI3JLQ/iZvs7wuczqYnD5VNGNcmij+fmvK43xSCDRQgY89Hf/yM8+avYdI HB6kdhMrJml4d4gw95bDUdMJIppZf7wPqhxubVJj/BxjkIKCcYvbkyT+JBzFg1SpdJBq vr4+d6rDbnIh6qKXIFue0vSFmrvMqzZVX2aoI=
In-reply-to: <94072F05-278C-4B79-BDF2-691A4BD9B773@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <94072F05-278C-4B79-BDF2-691A4BD9B773@xxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Jeff Gitchel <gitchel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> CFI 116
>
> In Rule 79, "its content may be modified using proposals"
> should be interpreted as "its content may be modified via the adoption of a proposal, as specified by that proposal".
>
> Ruling: False

I hereby request that everyone vote for proposals that, in their
opinions, make the LOGAS work as it should.

> This Judge recommends that this strange extra-ruleset Rule be brought into the Ruleset proper as soon as possible to clarify future
> ambiguities, and to make it more visible.

The LOGAS is not a Rule.

Oddly, it has rather more weight than a rule, as doing things that are
PROHIBITED by the rules has no punishment - unlike doing things which
are merely Generally Abhorred.

Oh, and to appease JamesB's wonderfully pedantic approach to
registrarhood, I change my name to the set of the following names:
{{Rule 700}}, {{teucer}}, {{Craig B. Daniel}}.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-b] CFI 116
  - From: M P Darke

References:
- [s-b] CFI 116
  - From: Jeff Gitchel

Prev by Date: [s-b] CFI 116
Next by Date: [s-b] Becoming A Player
Previous by thread: [s-b] CFI 116
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] CFI 116
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread