M P Darke on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:17:26 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] CFI 116 |
> Doing things that are PROHIBITED by the rules has no punishment - unlike doing things > which are merely Generally Abhorred. Pursuant to the above quoted message, I submit a Proposal: { Title: { Add Prohibition Punishments! } Body: { Create a new Rule: { Title: { Punishments } { Body: { Calls for Punishment (CFPs) are Official Documents, and as such, this Rule defers to Rule 8. When a Player performs a PROHIBITED action, any Player may issue a Call for Punishment, which must detail the exact action committed (including documentation, if possible). This may also include a request for a particular punishment for the mentioned offence. CFPs submitted after two nweeks have passed since the commiting of the offence are invalid. CFPs are assigned a serial number, which may be used to refer to them. The Rulekeepor is required to keep track of any and all Calls for Punishment. Players may become Executioners by submitting a request to the Rulekeepor. Executioners function similarly to Judges. (For more details, see Rule 40.) Once an Executioner has submitted a Judgement to a CFP, the actions details within it are either automatically carried out, or must be carried out within two nweeks, after which a CFP may be submitted as per the process outlined in this rule. An Executioner may not judge cases relating to emself. A Player who has had a CFP issued against em (the Defendant) may appeal against the CFP. This creates a CFI with the text "CFP (serial number) was submitted wrongly." Wrongly submitting a CFP is discouraged. [[This rule will give some incentive to not carry out Prohibited actions.]] Append to the LOGAS: "Wrongly submitting a CFP." }}}}} _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business