Charles Walker on Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:59:49 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Proposal: Hurried Proposals |
Ok.. Here's hoping this is the last change: I revise the Proposal Hurried Proposals to read: { Create a new rule titled 'Tweaks' with the following text: { A player may, as a Game Action, submit a Tweak. A Tweak is a list of arbitrary changes to the gamestate. If a Tweak has not received more than 1 objections 3 ndays after its submission, the list of changes it specifies is followed to make the resulting changes to the game occur. } } Do you want to make the 'Justice League' Faction or shall I? On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Actually, now I think YOU're right. It's probably more common for one > person > to be unhelpful than for one person to be picked on via tweak! > > A simple fix: We go ahead with the no-two-objections one, then form a > "justice league" of at least two people. These two are obliged to object to > any tweak which unfairly singles out a single player. > > Also, it could have a better name... > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Charles Walker < > charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I suppose, but not allowing any objections makes it easy for one person > to > > be... unhelpful. Actually, on the whole, I think you're right. > > I amend the Proposal Hurried Proposals to read: > > > > { > > > > Create a new rule titled 'Tweaks' with the following text: > > > > { > > > > A player may, as a Game Action, perform a Tweak. A Tweak is a list > > of arbitrary changes to the gamestate. If a Tweak has not received any > > objections 3 ndays after its submission, the list of changes it specifies > > is > > followed to make the resulting changes to the game occur. > > > > } > > > > } > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Jamie Dallaire < > bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > How about no objections at all? Allowing one makes it a little too easy > > to > > > pick on one person, no? > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-business mailing list > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business