Charles Walker on Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:59:49 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Proposal: Hurried Proposals


Ok.. Here's hoping this is the last change:
I revise the Proposal Hurried Proposals to read:

{

Create a new rule titled 'Tweaks' with the following text:

{

A player may, as a Game Action, submit a Tweak. A Tweak is a list
of arbitrary changes to the gamestate. If a Tweak has not received more than
1 objections 3 ndays after its submission, the list of changes it specifies
is followed to make the resulting changes to the game occur.

 }

 }

Do you want to make the 'Justice League' Faction or shall I?

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Actually, now I think YOU're right. It's probably more common for one
> person
> to be unhelpful than for one person to be picked on via tweak!
>
> A simple fix: We go ahead with the no-two-objections one, then form a
> "justice league" of at least two people. These two are obliged to object to
> any tweak which unfairly singles out a single player.
>
> Also, it could have a better name...
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Charles Walker <
> charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I suppose, but not allowing any objections makes it easy for one person
> to
> > be... unhelpful. Actually, on the whole, I think you're right.
> > I amend the Proposal Hurried Proposals to read:
> >
> > {
> >
> > Create a new rule titled 'Tweaks' with the following text:
> >
> > {
> >
> > A player may, as a Game Action, perform a Tweak. A Tweak is a list
> > of arbitrary changes to the gamestate. If a Tweak has not received any
> > objections 3 ndays after its submission, the list of changes it specifies
> > is
> > followed to make the resulting changes to the game occur.
> >
> >  }
> >
> >  }
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Jamie Dallaire <
> bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx
> > >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > How about no objections at all? Allowing one makes it a little too easy
> > to
> > > pick on one person, no?
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business