Re: [s-b] Consultation 211

[Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Definitely CONSISTENT. The consultation is part of the gamestate, the
consultation consulted on itself, therefore it was relevant to the
gamestate.

2009/2/10 James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I believe that "the consultation below" was Consultation 210.
>
>
>
> I answer Consultation 211 YES.
>
>
>
> Reasoning: the question was clearly a test of the following part of 5E36:
>
>
>
> {If a Statement is submitted, it shall be treated as a Question of the form "is it true that <statement>?".}
>
>
>
> and could have revealed moderate game breakage.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get all your favourite content with the slick new MSN Toolbar - FREE
> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354027/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business