Re: [s-b] More wording shenanigans

Ed Murphy on Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:51:55 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] More wording shenanigans

To: B Nomic Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] More wording shenanigans
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:52:55 -0800
In-reply-to: <356211.97646.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <356211.97646.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Marr965 wrote:

> I submit a consultation:
> "
> Is the consultation below relevant to the game state?
> "

This is Consultation 211.  I assign it to Priest JamesB.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

Follow-Ups:
- [s-b] Consultation 211
  - From: James Baxter

References:
- Re: [s-b] More wording shenanigans
  - From: M P Darke

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] More wording shenanigans
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] More wording shenanigans
Next by thread: [s-b] Consultation 211
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread