[s-b] Consultation 211

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:52:55 -0800

> From: emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx

> Subject: Re: [s-b] More wording shenanigans

> 

> Marr965 wrote:

> 

> > I submit a consultation:

> > "

> > Is the consultation below relevant to the game state?

> > "

> 

> This is Consultation 211. I assign it to Priest JamesB.

 

I believe that "the consultation below" was Consultation 210.

 

I answer Consultation 211 YES.

 

Reasoning: the question was clearly a test of the following part of 5E36:

 

{If a Statement is submitted, it shall be treated as a Question of the form "is it true that <statement>?".}

 

and could have revealed moderate game breakage.

_________________________________________________________________
Get all your favourite content with the slick new MSN Toolbar - FREE
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354027/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business