Re: [s-b] (no subject)

[<bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I Claim the below answer to be Consistent.

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:09:07 -0500, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I find the Answer below to be Consistent. However, I may be the
Supplicant.
> 
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:06 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>> I have to say, that sounds ridiculous. I find this (if I can)
> INCONSISTENT.
>>
>>
>> --- On Fri, 30/1/09, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [s-b] Reassignments
>> To: "B Nomic - Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Friday, 30 January, 2009, 1:25 AM
>>
>> I answer NO, only one well-sharpened pencil can and does exist, per
>> Supplicant's reasoning.
>>
>>
>> > I assign Consultation 205 to Priest j.
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business