[s-b] (no subject)

M P Darke on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:06:27 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-b] (no subject)

To: Nomic <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [s-b] (no subject)
From: M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:06:16 +0000 (GMT)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=YVSw5g04loNvWefDe8vTIQKcaXy3VfeoX1Z2FzWglCTA/ohQyh+bm96Q6KLuEZcYPTOu1eNKmuQyPND5UA/n0A9Dw0Noyt9IjQTLnlmyxO9UdYSWG75fU2iDLOs12KCXCAnlJlrmq7eDqkn65iGtWDm+2GMy50somZSQdpYxAMQ=;

I have to say, that sounds ridiculous. I find this (if I can) INCONSISTENT.


--- On Fri, 30/1/09, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] Reassignments
To: "B Nomic - Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 30 January, 2009, 1:25 AM

I answer NO, only one well-sharpened pencil can and does exist, per
Supplicant's reasoning.


> I assign Consultation 205 to Priest j.
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business


      
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: comex

Next by Date: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation 196 on ehird and the time rip
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread