| Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:09:13 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] (no subject) |
I find the Answer below to be Consistent. However, I may be the Supplicant. On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:06 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have to say, that sounds ridiculous. I find this (if I can) INCONSISTENT. > > > --- On Fri, 30/1/09, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [s-b] Reassignments > To: "B Nomic - Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Friday, 30 January, 2009, 1:25 AM > > I answer NO, only one well-sharpened pencil can and does exist, per > Supplicant's reasoning. > > > > I assign Consultation 205 to Priest j. > > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business