Ed Murphy on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:55:59 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Ha Haaaa!! |
Codae wrote: > I Answer Consultation 206 NO. > > Reasoning: > { > Overlooking the Supplicant's misuse of the word "it's", a Player may not perform a dependent action without announcing intent. > } > > However, the Objection/Supporter requirements apply only to taking the action 2-4 ndays after intent. Therefore, > > I submit the following Tweak: > > { > > A Rule is created, named "Y2K", with the text > { > The Player named Codae may change the gamestate in any way, at any time. > } > > An Essential Rule is created, named "Y3K", with the text > { > The Player named Codae may, as a Game Action, change the state of the game in any way. This Rule takes precedence over all other Rules. > } > > In Rule 5E11, > { > Between 2 and 4 ndays after the intent was announced, the action may be performed by the Player if and only if: > } > is replaced with > { > The action may be performed by the Player if: > > * Between 2 and 4 ndays (inclusive) have elapsed since the intent was announced. > } > > } > > I announce my intent to perform the action of Activating the above Tweak. > > I activate the above Tweak. > > I change the gamestate by Repealing any Rule named "Y2K". > > I change the gamestate by Repealing any Rule named "Y3K". I object to all Tweaks quoted above. To the PF, yet. I'm taking a short break during a field appointment for work, so will record your answer to 206 this evening. I also plan to propose a general cleanup of 5E10 and 5E11. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business