| Ed Murphy on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:55:59 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Ha Haaaa!! |
Codae wrote:
> I Answer Consultation 206 NO.
>
> Reasoning:
> {
> Overlooking the Supplicant's misuse of the word "it's", a Player may not perform a dependent action without announcing intent.
> }
>
> However, the Objection/Supporter requirements apply only to taking the action 2-4 ndays after intent. Therefore,
>
> I submit the following Tweak:
>
> {
>
> A Rule is created, named "Y2K", with the text
> {
> The Player named Codae may change the gamestate in any way, at any time.
> }
>
> An Essential Rule is created, named "Y3K", with the text
> {
> The Player named Codae may, as a Game Action, change the state of the game in any way. This Rule takes precedence over all other Rules.
> }
>
> In Rule 5E11,
> {
> Between 2 and 4 ndays after the intent was announced, the action may be performed by the Player if and only if:
> }
> is replaced with
> {
> The action may be performed by the Player if:
>
> * Between 2 and 4 ndays (inclusive) have elapsed since the intent was announced.
> }
>
> }
>
> I announce my intent to perform the action of Activating the above Tweak.
>
> I activate the above Tweak.
>
> I change the gamestate by Repealing any Rule named "Y2K".
>
> I change the gamestate by Repealing any Rule named "Y3K".
I object to all Tweaks quoted above. To the PF, yet.
I'm taking a short break during a field appointment for work, so will
record your answer to 206 this evening. I also plan to propose a
general cleanup of 5E10 and 5E11.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business