Re: [s-b] [s-d] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Of course, CONSISTENT means they don't exist, and thus aren't in the
> possession of Nobody. So your argument and your reasoning are mutually
> contradictory.
>   

Nothing in the rules says my arguments and my conclusions have to agree. 
They serve different purposes.

> (I don't think this should be a Paradox, but I do think judging it as
> Charles did is silly.)
>   

I submit a proposal titled "Delay PARADOX Wins" {

Prepend to the Trigger for "Win By Paradox" the sentence "The current 
nweek is higher than 156."

/*    We're in 154 now, so 2+ nweeks to de-paradox ourselves before 
granting wins    */

}


_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business