Re: [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

I claim this Answer to be INCONSISTENT. I go for j's argument that the macks
are owned by Nobody. Also see my Answer to the other, related Consultation,
that will be forthcoming.

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Charles Schaefer
<chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> 2008/12/31, Warrigal ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx <ihope127%2Bw@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >
> > Consultation 184:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Ehird wants to know what happened to eir mackerel. I think they're
> > > gone, but the rules don't make this happen explicitly, so why not use
> > > the judgment system to find out? I submit the following Consultation:
> > >
> > > {Are there any Mackerel formerly owned by ehird?}
> >
> > The eligible priests are BobTHJ, Tyler, w1n5t0n, 0x44, JamesB, Murphy,
> > and Billy Pilgrim. My seven-sided die says 3, so I assign Consultation
> > 184 to w1n5t0n.
>
>
> Answer: NO.
> Reasoning: The rules are silent on this matter, so I will legislate from
> the
> bench. When a player forfeits, their mackerel cease to exist. The answer to
> this specific consultation arguably would have been YES if ehird had
> transferred any mackerel to anyone since the era reset, but I can find no
> evidence that he did so.
>
> --
> > w1n5t0n aka
> > Charles Schaefer
>  _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business