Elliott Hird on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:10:01 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Consultation 170



On 18 Dec 2008, at 17:30, James Baxter wrote:

I answer YES to this consultation as the answers to consultations must be in keeping with previous consultations or they will be declared incosistent and become invalid, thus making all consultations that do not follow previous precedent untrue.

INCONSISTENT; misses the point.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business