comex on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:57:59 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Consultation: Consultation Answer Effects? |
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Oracularity: > {{ > In Rule 4E18, in the section "The Answer", insert as a final paragraph: > { > When a Consultation with an Answer of YES or NO becomes Pondered, the > Gamestate is changed to be what it would be if the question asked in > the Consultation were true or false respectively at the time it was > asked, for the reasons given in the Priest's Reasoning. The Priest's > reasoning should not, for any other purposes, be taken to have the > implicit effect of creating a new rule outside of the Ruleset or > having any special significant in the judgments of other Priests on > similar Consultations. /*This is what Oracularities are for.*/ > } I claim this to be inconsistent. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business