Re: [s-b] ballot

Charles Schaefer on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:04:31 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] ballot

To: "B Nomic Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] ballot
From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:04:23 -0800
In-reply-to: <cf0c2a990803251754p6e42fe34y107c5157f528d3f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cf0c2a990803251754p6e42fe34y107c5157f528d3f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I vote as follows:
p386: FOR
p387: FOR
p388: FOR
p389: AGAINST
p390: FOR
p391: AGAINST (If this proposal fails, does that bring the rapier back?)
p392: FOR
p393: ABSTAIN (I would have voted FOR if the Internomic didn't start with
the Suber ruleset.)
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- [s-b] ballot
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] ballot
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] ballot
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] ballot
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] ballot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread