Re: [s-b] Consultation: First Frag

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 4, 2008 11:56 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 11:17 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2008 4:11 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jan 24, 2008 8:36 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Jan 23, 2008 10:08 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > I submit the following Consultation
> > > > > {{
> > > > > Is 0x44 Guilty as per Rule 55 for the murder of Hose?
> > > > > }}
> > > > >
> > > > > Reasoning:
> > > > > I am Dead.
> > > >
> > > > This is Consultation #97 (assuming Hose is in fact dead). I assign it
> > > > to Priest Aaron C.
> > > >
> > > > Oracle BobTHJ
> > > >
> > > Priest Aaron C's answer to Consultation #97 has been declared
> > > inconsistent and as a result this consultation is once again waiting.
> > >
> > > I re-assign this consultation to Priest Wooble.
> > >
> >
> > I re-assign this consultation to Priest Murphy.
> >
> > Oracle BobTHJ
> >
> I re-assign this consultation to Priest Codae.
>
> Oracle BobTHJ
>
This is the consultation that will not die. It has been declared
inconsistent for a second time.

I re-assign this consultation to Priest 0x44.

Oracle BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business