Justin Ahmann on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:49:10 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Consultation: First Frag


I answer Consultation 97 Yes.

Reasoning: This answer isn't actually important; we know he's not guilty.  It's the Oracularity that matters.

Oracularity: If Squeezing the Artisan has no effect on the game, Squeeze the Artisan.

Codae


----- Original Message ----
From: Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2008 1:56:51 AM
Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation: First Frag

On Jan 31, 2008 11:17 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jan 28, 2008 4:11 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 24, 2008 8:36 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Jan 23, 2008 10:08 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > I submit the following Consultation
> > > > {{
> > > > Is 0x44 Guilty as per Rule 55 for the murder of Hose?
> > > > }}
> > > >
> > > > Reasoning:
> > > > I am Dead.
> > >
> > > This is Consultation #97 (assuming Hose is in fact dead). I assign it
> > > to Priest Aaron C.
> > >
> > > Oracle BobTHJ
> > >
> > Priest Aaron C's answer to Consultation #97 has been declared
> > inconsistent and as a result this consultation is once again waiting.
> >
> > I re-assign this consultation to Priest Wooble.
> >
>
> I re-assign this consultation to Priest Murphy.
>
> Oracle BobTHJ
>
I re-assign this consultation to Priest Codae.

Oracle BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business