Re: [s-b] [s-d] field action

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 6, 2008 4:17 PM, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I take the reparationist approach and answer this Consultation NO,
> with the following Oracularity:
>
> {In Rule 4E57, after "Each square on The Field is adjacent to the four
> squares directly bordering it.", add the sentence "Two Field Objects
> are adjacent if and only if some square occupied by one is adjacent to
> some square occupied by the other."
>
> In the Field Match B-Chess, replace "a King is created in the
> possession of each player and located on a random square of the Field.
> If any two Kings are adjacent, this process is repeated until no Kings
> are adjacent." with "all Field Objects are destroyed, then a King is
> created in the possession of each player and located on a random
> unoccupied square of the Field. If any two Kings are adjacent, this
> process is repeated until no Kings are adjacent or three times more,
> whichever comes first."
>
> Destroy all Field Objects, then create a King in the possession of
> each player and located on a random unoccupied square of the Field. If
> any two Kings are adjacent, repeat this process until no Kings are
> adjacent or three times more, whichever comes first. [[This is exactly
> the same as the Effect of Initialize except without the bit about the
> action never having been invoked before.]]}
>

I claim this CONSISTENT

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business