ihope on Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:50:47 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] field action


On 05/02/2008, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 9:06 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Consultation:  Are there an infinite number of kings?
> >
> > (Arguably, the repetition in Initialize doesn't proceed until the
> > Referee actually chooses the next batch of random numbers, in which
> > case the current match could be salvaged by way of the Referee
> > intentionally failing to do so.)
> This is Consultation #104. I assign it to Priest Ivan Hope.
> Oracle BobTHJ

I take the es-como-es approach and answer this Consultation NO, with
the Reasoning of "Adjacency for Field Objects is undefined." and the
Oracularity of "The initial placement of Kings is made the current
placement of Kings."

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
spoon-business mailing list