Re: [s-b] Consultation: Hot Tomato

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 22, 2008 5:40 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following Consultation. Again, please clarify via oracularity:
>
> Question: Is the device owner of the device named "Hot Tomato" the Player
> named Hose, as of the time of submission of this Consultation?
>
> Unbeliever: 0x44
>
> Reasoning:
> {
> Note that I could just as easily have made this a question on Hose's or
> 0x44's number of Hit Points, since ownership of the Hot Tomato decreases
> one's HP at the start of any nweek.
>
> 0x44 began nweek 137 as device owner of the Hot Tomato. During said nweek,
> he announced that he was Throwing the Hot Tomato to Hose and then
> immediately changed his own DNA to TT, which matches Hose's DNA (at the time
> the action was taken as well as at the time this consultation is submitted).
>
> Rule 4E24 says that "A Player may not perform any action that directly
> causes the Hit Points of another Player who is currently his Twin to be
> reduced."
>
> Does Throwing the Hot Tomato at another Player "directly" cause that
> Player's Hit Points to be reduced? Does it matter whether the two Players
> are Twins at the time the action is taken, or at the time the Hit Points are
> reduced? I believe that the formulation of Rule 4E24 is ambiguous in these
> matters.
> }
>

This is consultation #94. I assign it to Priest Aaron C.

Oracle BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business