Re: [s-b] [s-d] Proposal: 296 conflict 297

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oh, yeah.  Now I see.  I submit the following Consultation:
{
Is it possible to Hurry a Proposal?
Reasoning: Hurrying a Proposal requires Quorum minus one Supporters, but Quorum (and thus Quorum minus one) is undefined.
}

Codae


----- Original Message ----
From: Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 9:18:53 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: 296 conflict 297

On Jan 22, 2008 9:15 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Why are you submitting this Proposal?


Because Proposal 296 broke Proposal 297. Or the other way around. One way or
the other, one now needs the support of Quorum minus one individuals in
order to hurry any proposal. Quorum is now a totally undefined term, having
been replaced by Quiggle in other parts of the Ruleset. So the entire
Hurrying process is broken. IMO it's currently impossible to hurry anything
despite the nice mod Ivan made.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business