Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation: Criminal Case

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 21, 2008 10:05 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following Consultation:
>
>        Is Codae guilty of violating Rule 4E56 for not updating the
>        Public Display for the Ministry of Questions?
>
> Unbeliever:  Codae
>
> Reasoning:
>
> I refer to BobTHJ's reasoning in his similar Consultation, except
> that he mistakenly specified Rule 59 instead of Rule 56 (as well as
> generally omitting 4E prefixes).
>
This is consultation #92. I assign it to Priest Wooble.

NOTE #1: It was Hose (not myself) who submitted Consultation #91.

NOTE #2: I am assigning Priests randomly from among all possible
candidates to prevent favoritism in priest selection.

Oracle BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business