Roger Hicks on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:45:11 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case |
On Jan 19, 2008 1:22 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I hereby charge Codae with a Misdemeanor offense under Rule 59. I > submit the following Consutlation: > > {{ > Is Codae guilty of violating Rule 59 for not updating the Public > Display for the Ministry of Questions? > > Unbeliever: Codae > }} > > Reasoning: > Rule 18 states that the Oracle is responsible for maintaining a Public > Display of the current Consultations. I interpret this to be an > obligation of the Ministry, and a Minister shall fulfill any > obligations as stated in Rule 53 which makes him liable under Rule 59. > I bring this case forward, not because the duties were not performed > in error or confusion, but because he willingly ducked these > responsibilities as an "experiment". I recommend the maximum fine of > m50, one point on his license, and two minutes in the penalty box. > This is Consultation #91. I assign it to Priest 0x44. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business