Roger Hicks on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:45:11 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case


On Jan 19, 2008 1:22 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I hereby charge Codae with a Misdemeanor offense under Rule 59. I
> submit the following Consutlation:
>
> {{
> Is Codae guilty of violating Rule 59 for not updating the Public
> Display for the Ministry of Questions?
>
> Unbeliever: Codae
> }}
>
> Reasoning:
> Rule 18 states that the Oracle is responsible for maintaining a Public
> Display of the current Consultations. I interpret this to be an
> obligation of the Ministry, and a Minister shall fulfill any
> obligations as stated in Rule 53 which makes him liable under Rule 59.
> I bring this case forward, not because the duties were not performed
> in error or confusion, but because he willingly ducked these
> responsibilities as an "experiment". I recommend the maximum fine of
> m50, one point on his license, and two minutes in the penalty box.
>

This is Consultation #91. I assign it to Priest 0x44.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business