Re: [s-b] Proposal: We're not doing this anyway...

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

I revise Proposal 248, in order to bring Rule Number references in line with
the new system, to read as follows:

 {
> In Rule 18, replace the following text:
> {{
> Consultations automatically gain a Consultation Number when assigned
> to a Priest. For each new Consultation, the Consultation number shall
> be equal to 1 or, if such Number is already in use, to the greatest
> existing Consultation Number incremented by one. The Oracle may
> arbitrarily override the normal assignment of Consultation numbers,
> and choose a number of his liking for a new Consultation.
> }}
> By the following:
> {{
> Consultations are given a Consultation Number by the Oracle when
> assigned to a Priest. For each new Consultation, the Consultation
> number is usually equal to 1 or, if such Number is already in use, to
> the greatest existing Consultation Number incremented by one. The
> Oracle may arbitrarily override the normal assignment of Consultation
> numbers, and choose a number of his liking for a new Consultation.
> }}
> }
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business