Re: [s-b] Voting + Some Game Actions

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I declare your taking the Ministry of Questions invalid.

I take the Ministry of Questions.


Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> On 12/9/07, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> On Dec 9, 2007 7:27 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>     
>>> {
>>> "As Rulekeeper, I change the number of Rule 1-17 to 1-22" is valid.
>>>
>>> Unbeliever: Wooble
>>>
>>> Reasoning: I think Rule 1-8 is pretty clear...
>>> }
>>>       
>> This is Consultation 71.
>>
>>     
>>> {  "As Rulekeeper, I change the number of Rule 1-1 to 1-17" is valid.
>>>
>>> Unbeliever: Wooble
>>>
>>> Reasoning: No seriously, just read rule 1-8... :-p
>>> }
>>>       
>> This is Consultation 72.
>>
>>     
>>> I humbly ask the Minister of Questions to assign these Consultations to
>>> Priest Hose. Hose is the Player whose Repeal Proposal (Number 205) was
>>> affected by these Actions.
>>>       
>> Actually, it's Proposals 202 and 212 that would be affected, both of
>> which passed.
>>
>> 205 was your proposal and has nothing to do with either Rule 1-1 or  1-17.
>>
>> I not so humbly ZOT consultations 71 and 72 as I find them unworthy.
>>     
>
>
> I declare Oracle Wooble's ZOTTING of Consultation 71, and his ZOTTING of
> Consultation 72, to be invalid.
>
> I take the Ministry of Questions.
>
> I assign Consultations 71 and 72 to Priest Hose.
>
> I bid all Players to join me in a game of Monopoly.
>
> Oracle Billy Pilgrim
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business