Mike McGann on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:37:10 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Consultation 49


I claim this to be CONSISTENT.

"The Registrar may refuse to allow any External Force to become a
player, and may..."

Qualifications in the remainder of the sentence apply to the refusal
of a name change, not tot he refusal of player membership.

- Hose

On Nov 25, 2007 11:31 AM, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I answer Consultation 49:
>
> Yes, Registrar Wooble has the power to refuse Agora as a player.
>
> Reasoning:
>     The Registrar has the power to refuse to allow any External Force to
> become a player if /e/ believes that its name would be ambiguous,
> confusing, or could otherwise damage the integrity of this game. There
> is nothing in the rules that would allow a player, consultation, or game
> action to reverse or override the Registrar's belief. Further, the
> Registrar is not required to state a reason for refusal.
>
>
> --
> --
> 0x4461736864617368;
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business