Mike McGann on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:37:10 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Consultation 49 |
I claim this to be CONSISTENT. "The Registrar may refuse to allow any External Force to become a player, and may..." Qualifications in the remainder of the sentence apply to the refusal of a name change, not tot he refusal of player membership. - Hose On Nov 25, 2007 11:31 AM, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I answer Consultation 49: > > Yes, Registrar Wooble has the power to refuse Agora as a player. > > Reasoning: > The Registrar has the power to refuse to allow any External Force to > become a player if /e/ believes that its name would be ambiguous, > confusing, or could otherwise damage the integrity of this game. There > is nothing in the rules that would allow a player, consultation, or game > action to reverse or override the Registrar's belief. Further, the > Registrar is not required to state a reason for refusal. > > > -- > -- > 0x4461736864617368; > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business