Re: [s-b] Submitting another consultation.

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

I answer Consultation 38 "YES".

Consultations 36 and 37 are valid.  Rule 2-5 gives the Oracle the
power to assign Consultation numbers as he sees fit, and nothing in
the rules suggests that his exercise of this power invalidates a
Consultation.

--Priest Wooble

On Nov 20, 2007 10:52 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I exercise my prerogative as Oracle and assign this Consultation
> Consultation Number 38 (I believe the Consultations referred to by the
> supplicant are in fact Numbers 36 and 37, as there is (until now) no
> Consultation 38). I select Wooble as Priest.
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
>
>
> On 11/20/07, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > {{
> >    Question: Are the two previous consultations currently known as
> > Consultations 37 and 38 valid?
> >
> >    Reasoning:
> >       Rule 2-5 states that Consultations automatically gain a
> > Consultation number upon submission. Each number shall be equal to 1 or
> > to the greatest existing Consultation number increased by one. The
> > highest Consultation number prior to two previous was 68, therefore
> > Consultations 37 and 38 are not Consultations.
> >
> >    Unbeliever: Billy Pilgrim
> > }}
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > 0x4461736864617368;
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business