Re: [s-b] Consultation on Agora Faction

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

I assign this Consultation #34 and ZOT it as no longer relevant.


On 8/16/07, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following as a Consultation:
>
> {{{Agora is a Faction.}}}
>
> Reasoning: comex, a Player of Agora, sent a message to the Public
> Forum claiming to make Agora a faction.
>
> Agora's ruleset seems to meet the criteria of a B Nomic Agreement:
> 1. The set of parties who agree to be bound by the Rules is defined by
> the Rules (although there is occasional judicial review of exactly
> which entities are, in fact, Players, this review is within the Rules
> too so I think it's probably covered)
> 2. The procedures for joining and leaving the agreement are well defined.
> 3. Decisions to be made on Agora's behalf (including changed to the
> Rules) are made through an explicitly-defined way
> 4. All Players have explicitly consented to be Players and may leave
> at any time.
> 5. The agreement is publicly available at
> http://www.fysh.org/~zefram/agora/current_slr.txt
>
> An Agoran CFJ on the statement "A Player of Agora who is not the
> Ambassador CAN unilaterally take Game Actions in a foreign nomic on
> Agora's behalf if it is legal for Agora to take those Actions in the
> foreign nomic." was judged to be UNDECIDABLE, as Agora's rules do not
> generally regulate actions taken outside of Agora, whether they claim
> to be on Agora's behalf or not.
>


-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business