Daniel Lepage on Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:24:14 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] nweek 113 ballot |
I vote as follows: > 21 The Temporal Prime Directive FOR > 22 You need to *work* to win FOR > 23 Legal Mode AGAINST > 24 Monopoly Mode FOR > 25 Win or Win or Win AGAINST > 26 Disambiguation FOR > 27 Jurisdictional boundaries FOR > 28 The Slim Shady Clause FOR [[But maybe for scripting purposes we should assign each player a unique unchanging identifier. That way, for example, we wouldn't have two separate wiki categories "Proposals/Author/comex" and "Proposals/ Author/TheAdministrator"]] > 29 Generality HIPPOPOTAMUS [[ I don't really like the attribute system, it seems like an overcomplicated way to do something that would work fine implicitly. ]] > 30 some RFJ fixes FOR > 31 populate $wgLogo AGAINST [[ A) I don't think this prop does anything, B) I'd really like to see some other options before fixing an official logo ]] > 32 Proposal to reduce redundancy (which will be reduced by passing > this proposal) DON ALVERZO'S TWEEZERS [[ This doesn't seem to do anything useful. ]] > 33 Posts FOR > 34 The rot sets in AGAINST [[ This still has Bob throwing 20 votes behind a proposal on the first round. ]] > 35 The Rules Rule AGAINST [[ What about rule-specified events, like proposal passage? If the game can't change because of those, then the game ends when this passes, because we will never be able to change the rules again. ]] > 36 extend commentability options FOR > 37 conflicts and dependencies FOR > 38 you know you want 'em FOR > 39 state of the union FOR > 40 Rename comex, too FOR > 41 Basic Scoring FOR [[ But I think this is too gentle on failed props. ]] > 42 Emergency Procedure Fixes FOR > 43 Monotonicity is rather dull, don't you think? FOR > 44 FOR -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business