comex on Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:14:49 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies |
On Friday 08 December 2006 12:42, bd wrote: > How about solving for the fewest number of votes (or smallest amount of > voting power) that would need to be changed to make the system > consistent? That is, for each subgraph of conflicting proposals, look > for the one with the smallest gap between FOR ang AGANST votes, make > that Lost, and repeat until everything works out. [[ Actually, bd's first comment illustrates a situation that would be ambiguous, since I neglected to specify an order (because for some reason I thought there were no cases like that). Anyway, since it's true that it will probably just be used for mutually exclusive proposals, I like that (quoted) idea. ]] I amend my proposal, >-quoted: > Add to the first paragraph of Rule 2-2: > {{ > A Historical proposal is also in one of the substates of Won or Lost, > initially Lost. > }} > > Replace the second-to-last paragraph of Rule 2-2 with the following: (Use > the Y-quoted text if a proposal titled "the rot sets in" passed, and the > X-quoted text if not.) > {{ > A Proposal may, in its body of text, list other Proposals as Dependencies. > It is said to Depend on those Proposals. > > A Proposal may also list other Proposals as Conflicts. If, in a set of two > Proposals, either lists the other as a Conflict, those Proposals are said > to Conflict with each other. > > X: A Proposal's Strength is equal to the difference between the number of > X: players whose Final Vote on that proposal was FOR and the number of > X: players whose Final Vote on that proposal was AGAINST. If a Proposal's > X: Strength is positive, it becomes Won. Otherwise, it becomes Lost. > > Y: A Proposal's Strength is equal to the difference between the sum of the > Y: strengths of all FOR final votes on it and the sum of the strengths of > Y: all AGAINST final votes on it. If a Proposal's Strength is positive and > Y: at least two voting objects have voted FOR on it with a strength greater > Y: than 0, the proposal becomes Won. Otherwise, it becomes Lost. > > In descending order of Strength, and of Number in cases where Strength is > equal, if a Won Proposal Conflicts with any other Won Proposals, those > Proposals become Lost. > > Repeat the following until no changes are made: {{ > In order from lowest to highest Proposal Number, if a Proposal Depends on a > Proposal that is Lost, it becomes Lost. > }} > > All Won Proposals Pass. > }}
Attachment:
pgpJ85oFtKx3V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business