[s-b] [auto] Peter votes

[automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Peter's votes:
Proposal 100/0: More Zapping                             : Against
I'm only against this since Wonko has a lot to gain from it at the moment, since I haven't been playing Tiles as much as I'd like to. It's probably a good idea in general.

Proposal 101/0: Small Changes                            : For
Proposal 102/2: Diplomatic Immunity (and double negatives) : For
Proposal 103/0: Set defence to maximum                   : For
Proposal 104/3: Yes; no; maybe so                        : For
Proposal 105/0: Comments really aren't  worth legislation. : Against
Proposal 106/0: Blatent Attempt To Take In Nomic Game    : Against
Proposal 107/0: Pure Silliness                           : For
Proposal 108/0: What A Silly Proposal [WASP]             : For
Proposal 109/1: Section Nine All Rules Everywhere [snare] : Against
I'm not really parsing this... We don't have a definition of "qualify as 'subgames'", and "Rules with no section" isn't a section at all, which is the point of its existence.

Proposal 110/1: Money Is Not Common Enough               : For
Proposal 111/0: It is sushi, that one that condemned 2: He returns disturba : Against
Proposal 112/1: The Baron's Story, Chapter Three: More Fun With Souls : Against
Proposal 113/2: nobody elects to work on reaching konsensus : Against
Proposal 97/3: Let's try this again, shall we?          : Against
Proposal 98/0: Don't Encourage Unneccesary CFI Emissions : For
Proposal 99/0: All Gambling Is Not Good                 : For

This Message was sent automatically by the Wiki.
 Please do not reply to the sender of this message, as your replies will be ignored. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business