Craig on Tue, 11 May 2004 20:50:31 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Spoon-business] RE: [spoon-discuss] nomination period ends soon |
>>> As i've previously said, Ministries are a bad idea for the same reasons >>> a >>> single administrator is a bad idea. Too much structure simply leads to >>> things that break when someone goes AWOL, forfeits or otherwise ceases >>> to >>> perform their ministerial functions. >> >> A backup minister would be a good idea, yes. At the very least the >> workload >> would be spread out a bit. If it dosen't work, we can switch to a better >> layout (invoking r0 if e.g., the rules minister and metaminister goes >> AWOL) >Even that, for me, is too inflexible. We are all in possession of the >required information to fulfil any Ministry - so why make it explicitly >the responsibility of one player? I would rather the functions were simply >taken up by whosoever desired to do the damn job >Look on it as Open Source government I agree with SkArcher. For this reason, I decline any nominations of me that may have been made. I also urge SkArcher to submit an "Open Source Government" proposal, which I would certainly vote for. If one person declines their nominations, they may think he's really sick and they won't take him. And if two people do it, in harmony, they may think they're an organization. And can you, can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day declining their nominations. And friends they may think it's a movement. - Teucer ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx teucer@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business