RE: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] When was the last time wehada CFI?

["SkArcher" <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spoon-discuss-bounces@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:spoon-discuss-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Anything McGee
> Sent: 22 September 2003 00:03
> To: discussion list for B Nomic
> Subject: Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] When was the last time
> wehada CFI?
>
>
> >Whose did you take, then? And where does it say that you can take them?
> >Wouldn't that count as a Gamestate change as well?
>
> I would interpret the rule as implying that the existing T-shirts
> are out in the open, available for the taking, as was the case at
> a conference I attended this weekend.  If they are privately
> owned, which the rule doesn't state, then I apologize for taking
> someone's shirt and will gladly return it.  I don't believe
> that's the case.
>
> Nowhere does it say that one can take them, but nowhere does it
> say that I can't.  I would not interpret taking a shirt as a
> change to the gamestate, unless it in fact was privately owned --
> the only way it might be a change to the gamestate is if it's
> added to one's notes in the Roster.  And even then, things
> included on the Roster don't necessarily require changes to the
> gamestate -- for example, I have the title "Veteran of B Nomic,"
> for which I had to do nothing except not forfeit.
>

I would percieve it as a change in the gamestate, to the effect that the T
shirt is no longer Unowned, but is instead owned by Anything McGee.

anyway, to patch the somewhat dubious logic you are attempting anyway, I
submit the following proposal:

{{__May, May, May__

change the text of rule 1082 to read

{{There may exist objects called T-shirts. T-shirts may have text on them.
T-shirts may only be modified as described in the rules.}}

}}

>
> McGee.

SkArcher

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business