Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] When was the last time wehad a CFI?

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 21 September 2003 07:02 pm, Anything McGee wrote:
> >Whose did you take, then? And where does it say that you can take them?
> >Wouldn't that count as a Gamestate change as well?
>
> I would interpret the rule as implying that the existing T-shirts are out
> in the open, available for the taking, as was the case at a conference I
> attended this weekend.  If they are privately owned, which the rule doesn't
> state, then I apologize for taking someone's shirt and will gladly return
> it.  I don't believe that's the case.
>
> Nowhere does it say that one can take them, but nowhere does it say that I
> can't.  I would not interpret taking a shirt as a change to the gamestate,
> unless it in fact was privately owned -- the only way it might be a change
> to the gamestate is if it's added to one's notes in the Roster.  And even
> then, things included on the Roster don't necessarily require changes to
> the gamestate -- for example, I have the title "Veteran of B Nomic," for
> which I had to do nothing except not forfeit.

[[ I disagee. T-Shirts, since they are defined in the rules are part of the 
gamestate. ]]

I create a CFI:
{{
Statement:
The taking, transfer, creation, destroction, and modification of T-shirts are 
all considered changes to the gamestate.

Analysis:
T-shirts are defined in rule 1082. This makes them, and any actions pertaining 
to them, part of the game state.

Defendant:
Anything McGee
}}

- -- 
bd
If you can't learn to do it well, learn to enjoy doing it badly.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/bjQTx533NjVSos4RAgbnAKC69ZJFyeUq65pbJe+l3UBI8Nd3FQCdHQeU
DbQwuHIkPeAbCBiUKZx+7Lo=
=FW0t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business