| bd on 31 Jul 2003 01:35:23 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 46 BALLOT |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 09:16 pm, Daniel Lepage wrote:
[snip]
> Personally, I feel that r1592 is a Bad Idea in general. There are many
> situations when we might want a subgame to take up multiple rules; and
> there's no reason why we can't put subgames into single rules anyway.
> This is just an irritating restriction that does nothing until it
> starts pissing us off.
>
> I was thinking about setting up a general structure for stones-laying
> games - define a grid, a stone, etc., and things like Go and Othello
> could use it to shorten their own definitions; but it falls apart
> because of 1592, unless Go, Othello, and Ataxx are all in the same rule
> (which is ugly and stupid).
I agree, and propose:
{{
__More is less__
Repeal rule 1592.
}}
- --
bd
BOFH Excuse #234:
Someone is broadcasting pygmy packets and the router doesn't know how to deal
with them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/KHI6x533NjVSos4RAiCKAKDCTXgEcozPWJmYhjY7grfrqP2MsACgpoD+
M9awEBdsAxmO9VHRpoxc3Ig=
=JTWD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business