bd on 31 Jul 2003 01:35:23 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 46 BALLOT |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 30 July 2003 09:16 pm, Daniel Lepage wrote: [snip] > Personally, I feel that r1592 is a Bad Idea in general. There are many > situations when we might want a subgame to take up multiple rules; and > there's no reason why we can't put subgames into single rules anyway. > This is just an irritating restriction that does nothing until it > starts pissing us off. > > I was thinking about setting up a general structure for stones-laying > games - define a grid, a stone, etc., and things like Go and Othello > could use it to shorten their own definitions; but it falls apart > because of 1592, unless Go, Othello, and Ataxx are all in the same rule > (which is ugly and stupid). I agree, and propose: {{ __More is less__ Repeal rule 1592. }} - -- bd BOFH Excuse #234: Someone is broadcasting pygmy packets and the router doesn't know how to deal with them. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/KHI6x533NjVSos4RAiCKAKDCTXgEcozPWJmYhjY7grfrqP2MsACgpoD+ M9awEBdsAxmO9VHRpoxc3Ig= =JTWD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business